Lester & Charlie Present

Posts Tagged ‘mitt romney’

Sanford & Scum

In Poll on May 10, 2013 at 12:48 pm

Sanford and son title card

This Week’s Poll!

Disgraced politicians everywhere are paying super-crazy-close attention to the surprise comeback of Mark Sanford, the studly Republican former governor of South Carolina who just won a special election to Congress. Sanford’s return is remarkable, of course, because of just how far he’d sunk. This is the guy who made “hiking the Appalachian Trail” the most overworked sexual double entendre of 2009.

But it seems that South Carolina voters are all too ready to forgive the “family values conservative” who misused public funds, secretly left the country and lied to his entire staff about his whereabouts and deceived his wife about his sexual affairs with his South American mistress. Sanford was even busted trespassing on his ex-wife’s property during this current campaign — the same campaign that his ex-wife declined to run for him when, unbelievably, he asked her to. This bad ole boy has certainly got some balls.

After all he put us through, Sanford’s latest victory has left much of the country pretty stunned. It really doesn’t seem that long ago that the S.C. legislature agonized for months over whether to impeach him for the 37 violations he was formally charged with. People: this is the same guy who once hopped on a state plane just to get a hair cut. Who was once named one of the worst governors by the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. The guy who made the words “soul mate” cringe-worthy.

Still, some are asking: Is all of this a cause for celebration or despair? Shouldn’t we be kinda sorta happy that the voters in South Carolina chose ideology over Puritanical reaction to all that ugly messy stuff?

Well, Sanford’s 9-point win loses some of that shine when you realize that Mitt Romney took the same district by a whopping 18 points in 2012, and that this district hasn’t sent a Democrat to D.C. since Dick Nixon learned to use chopsticks. And Paul Krugman, on his New York Times blog, argues it doesn’t even matter who you send to Congress, as long as he or she is from the party of your choice.

But, still… Sanford won.  And we’re in shock. Come on, this guy was supposed to be done. Maybe his opponent, Elizabeth Colbert Busch — who by most accounts ran a competent campaign — just didn’t try hard enough to appeal to South Carolina voters. Or maybe South Carolinians just happen to like their candidates Sanford-level crazy!

This got us thinking. What’s a Democrat have to do to get elected in states like South Carolina? How can they be competitive in a ring with odds and logic and common decency stacked against them? What do YOU think?

Want to find out what people wrote in? Subscribe to the Lester & Charlie Newsletter!

NEW Video From Lester & Charlie’s “Do It At Home, America!” Series: Make Your Own Penny Candy!

Have a private comment that you wouldn’t mind seeing broadcast to an international audience in the next Lester & Charlie Newsletter? Leave it here!

I Am… I Said

In Poll on May 3, 2013 at 10:08 am

Clint Eastwood Chair

This Week’s Poll!

Republicans give themselves more reasons to exercise their God-given spin control muscles than Democrats do.

Sure, Dems like Anthony Weiner have to tuck their Twitter accounts back in their pants now and then, and some sucker with industrial strength pliers has to shadow Joe Biden and dislodge that foot from his mouth every few days. But only the GOP has to own up to endless, egregious affronts on consensus reality — like Jan Brewer’s headless bodies in the desert, Bobby Jindal’sBible Math” and any noise that comes out of Michele Bachmann’s mouth when she opens it.

The Republicans have exercised so many spin control muscles that those muscles have started to act involuntarily and instantaneously.  Like the heart at the core of any wild animal, the GOP has developed an instant if not repetitive spin for everything. Got no experience? You’re the Washington outsider we need! Can’t locate Iraq on a map? Well then, you’re just like a regular American!

Sometimes, conservatives are so proud of how they’ve spun their embarrassments that they refuse let them go.  One of those embarrassments made two comebacks this year. We’re talking Clint Eastwood’s Empty Chair!

You know, that chair. The one Clint bizarrely dragged onstage at the 2012 GOP convention and had a long, painfully awkward one-way conversation with. Even Republicans were against this senile display before they were for it.

Inevitably, the chair’s first comeback was in January when it found a home in the office of RNC Chairman Reince Priebus. Talk about “owning” the party’s missteps! And this week, everybody’s favorite turtle impersonator, filibuster enthusiast and all around funnyman, Mitch McConnell, gave the spun-out meme a new spin.

Now, remember: this was the chair that made us imagine Obama telling Romney to go f**k himself. The one that inspired a guy in Texas to lynch his living room chair in effigy – probably while humming “Strange Fruit.” Even nutty Republican Governor Scott Walker described it at the time as “that one moment” at the convention that he truly “cringed about.” (Just one?)

So it was pretty bold of Mitch – in his public response to Obama’s comical jab at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner that ended with, “Really? Why don’t you get a drink with Mitch McConnell?” – to pose next to an empty chair reserved for Obama in a Twitter photo.

This got our brains a-whirl. If the Obama chair can make two comebacks, what’s next in the GOP garbage heap for them to recycle and rebrand?

What do you think? What’s the next political disaster they’ll turn into a triumph?

Want to find out what people wrote in? Subscribe to the Lester & Charlie Newsletter!

NEW Video From Lester & Charlie’s “Do It At Home, America!” Series: Make Your Penny Candy!

Have a private comment that you wouldn’t mind seeing broadcast to an international audience in the next Lester & Charlie Newsletter? Leave it here!

The Week in Politics

In Study Break on January 12, 2013 at 12:24 pm

A carpool lane is for two or more persons per vehicle. The definition of person in California’s Vehicle Code is a “natural person, firm, co-partnership, association, limited liability company, or corporation.”

So when Jonathan Frieman of San Rafael, Calif., was pulled over for driving alone in a carpool lane, he argued to the officer that, actually, he did have a passenger – namely, the certificate of incorporation sitting in the passenger seat.

Mr. Frieman hopes to use his traffic violation to overturn Citizens United. Flesh and blood humans wish him luck.

The Week in Politics

In Study Break on November 16, 2012 at 9:31 am

On November 6th, voters upheld a longstanding American tradition:

(Click to enlarge.)

Triggering another American tradition:

(Click to enlarge.)

Four more stages of Red State grief to go.

Come to Hey-Zeus

In Poll on November 14, 2012 at 11:53 pm

This Week’s Poll!

What a difference an election makes.  A few weeks ago, all the GOP wanted to do was arrest anyone with a darker tan than John Boehner. Suddenly, as the saying goes, the GOP can’t even get arrested.

Republicans are famous for having their own brand of arithmetic — the kind where 2+2 equals “x”and “x” can change as soon as someone asks “why?” But there are some numbers they can’t question, like the steep drop in voter support from Latino voters.

Forty-four percent of Latinos voted for George W. Bush in 2004, 31% supported John McCain in 2008 and a paltry 27% pulled for the now-forgotten Mitt Romney in 2012. That’s a downward spiral – even when the numbers are converted into socialist metric ones or God-sanctioned Bible Math!

In spite of all the calls for self-deportation of brown people, all those clever voter suppression initiatives — and even after all the poison they’ve been serving up at Taco Bell — the Latino demographic somehow keeps growing.  And they’re voting for Democrats. And the GOP finally smells big trouble.

Overnight, some of the most xenophobic figures in the GOP went from whistling Dixie to blowing smoke up Ricky Martin’s ass. Hardliner John Boehner suddenly wants immigration reform. FOX’s anti-evolution Sean Hannity says his hardline position has “evolved.” Even Jan Brewer, the “papers, please” governor of Arizona, says that she’s “fine and dandy” with immigration reform as long as we secure our border.  (From Democrats, no doubt.)

Of course, not every conservative jumped on the come-to-Hey-Zeus bandwagon. Some are freaking out. “Obama voters chose dependency over liberty,” tweeted Iowa Rep. Steve King, the same man who once compared immigrants to dogs. “Now establishment Republicans want citizenship for illegals. You can’t beat Santa Claus with amnesty.” Say that again? If that Santa Claus comment wasn’t strange enough for you, how about conservative radio host Bryan Fischer telling his national audience that the Latino vote actually has nothing to do with immigration — and everything to do with socialist Mexicans who want to “benefit from the plunder of the United States.” Umm. OK.

The GOP is going to be duking this one out for a while – at least until their inner jumping beans settle down. But with Latinos projected to make up 30% of the U.S. population by 2050, they’re going to have to figure out how to get Hispanics to vote for them sooner than later. Or their party will disappear entirely. We bet they’re tossing around some really genius ideas right now. Tell us what YOU think they’re going to do!

Want to find out what people wrote in? Subscribe to the Lester & Charlie Newsletter!

Racial profiling American style. Take a look!

Have a private comment that you wouldn’t mind seeing broadcast to an international audience in the next Lester & Charlie Newsletter? Leave it here!

The Week in Politics

In Study Break on November 10, 2012 at 1:40 pm

“While you’re saving your face, you’re losing your ass.”
~Lyndon B. Johnson

The Party’s Over

In Poll on November 8, 2012 at 10:56 am

This Week’s Poll!

Many viewers were thrown by how surprisingly nice they thought Mitt Romney’s concession speech was last Tuesday. “Short but gracious,” said the “Today” show. “Statesmanlike,” wrote BuzzFeed. Some pundits went so far as to speculate that we were at long last seeing “the real Mitt” and, if only he had campaigned as that guy, election night could have gone much differently.

Of course, we’re talking about Mitt Romney here. Romney made it his business to keep you guessing what, if anything, is going on behind that smirk of his. So it shouldn’t be shocking that some people drew the exact opposite conclusion. “He’s praying for you, America,” wrote a staff writer at Salon. “That’s not ‘gracious.’” Political analyst Scott Farris told the Washington Post that his speech made it sound as if Romney didn’t have “much respect, let alone affection” for the president.

Others wondered what in the world Romney was doing for almost two hours after most of the big networks conceded Ohio — and the election — to Obama. Was he scrambling to think of something to say? Surely Mitt was kidding when he said he hadn’t bothered to prepare any remarks in the event he lost.

At this point, we suppose we’ll never know who the “real Mitt” is.

The GOP will surely study this campaign carefully to try to figure out where it all went wrong. Was Romney too conservative? Not conservative enough? Maybe it’ll be different in four years if the GOP can just get their candidates to stop praising rape. Or maybe they’ll learn nothing at all and just blame Chris Christie.

So, while we’d like to say that Obama’s re-election means we dodged a bullet on Tuesday, really, how are we to know? Romney based his whole campaign on giving no clear indication whatsoever how he would actually govern. Our best guess is that even Romney didn’t know. Perhaps he was planning on winging it.

Still, like any good president-wannabe, Mitt managed to make a whole slew of promises, and his list for what he said he’d do on just his first day was impressive. Boost drilling. Sanction China. Sit down with Republicans and Democrats. “End these days of drift and disappointment.” (Whew. Perhaps on Day Two he was planning to rest.)

We’ll never get the chance to find out what Romney would’ve really done on his first day in office. (Insert collective sigh of relief.) But before he falls off the radar completely, let’s have some fun speculating! Given that he loved to keep us guessing, what do YOU think a President Romney REALLY would have done on his first day in office?

Want to find out what people wrote in? Subscribe to the Lester & Charlie Newsletter!

Lester & Charlie filed their first report 4 years ago this week, on the day Obama won his first term. Take a look!

Have a private comment that you wouldn’t mind seeing broadcast to an international audience in the next Lester & Charlie Newsletter? Leave it here!

Romney to the Rescue?

In Poll on October 31, 2012 at 3:30 pm

This Week’s Poll!

Here at the Lester & Charlie Institute of Forward Thinking, we love to track current events! Though sometimes things get in the way. Such as Hurricane Sandy, who came, saw and conquered as if she had memorized the script that those pagan scientists, meteorologists and computer simulators had written for her. One of the side effects was grounding the planes that were shuttling the presidential campaigns into the last few days of the election cycle – which we thought was the only current event left.

But wait. Did it really grind the campaign to a halt or did it give each candidate a chance to show how they respond to emergencies? Even before the storm hit, and just based on those predictions from the pagans, President Obama made it abundantly clear that the federal government was there for the states and that he had an open phone line available to governors with a blank storm relief checkbook sitting next to it.  He instructed federal agencies, even the deservedly maligned FEMA, to get off their butts and start moving.

Did someone say FEMA or federal funds? The Romney campaign certainly heard it, and for the Romney campaign, thems fightin’ words. Romney is on record for stating (read: soon denying) his conviction that FEMA and all federal emergency aid should be cut for being immoral and that the responsibility for disaster relief should be shifted to the all-knowing states – because they are so much better equipped to take care of their own. States like… well, pick any Red State. Almost all of them hate taxes and hate the federal government but are always first in line for federal handouts when disaster strikes. Disasters seem to strike Red States more often than others – in spite of their close connections to Jesus and his pet dinosaur angels!

For the record, let’s note that most federal tax revenue comes from Blue States and gets sent to Red States, who claim they don’t want it but still take it even though it’s sooooo socialist. But even New Jersey’s governor, Chris Christie — a man who never met a conservative policy he wouldn’t swallow — praised Obama for stepping up to the plate and using the forces of good (federal money) to counteract the forces of (nature’s) evil.

So how did Romney weather this storm? He pitched in! He got some paid supporters in Ohio to donate a bunch of bottled water and diapers and cans of tomato puree to the Red Cross and he even helped load up the goods in a Penske rental truck! A truck that, by now, has most likely veered off a shovel-ready bridge project that Congress wouldn’t let Obama fix — because it would require socialist federal funds.

Good job, Mitt!

Oh, but wait. While the Red Cross, which has been raising money even longer than Jerry Lewis – if that’s possible – expressed tepid gratitude for the donation, the organization makes it abundantly clear on its website that this kind of donation “impedes the valuable resources of money, time, and personnel” because it has to be processed and dealt with. What they really want is donations of blood and money. Money allows the relief team that’s working on the ground — the only folks who can see what’s really going on in real time — to decide whether the millions of victims without homes, power and/or medicine really need tomato puree, or, say, insulin. And then go out and buy it. From somewhere close.

Hmm. That’s kind of like Obama’s storm relief checkbook! 

This gets a person’s imagination stirring faster than the spoon in Christine O’Donnell’s big black witch’s kettle. Imagine it’s two years from now and a Katrina- or Sandy-like disaster hits the U.S. Given what we know about him, how would a President Romney make sure that the innocent, needy victims are taken care of? What steps would he take first?

Want to find out what people wrote in? Subscribe to the Lester & Charlie Newsletter!

Lester & Charlie would like you to watch this before casting your vote: Don’t Be a Sucker!

Have a private comment that you wouldn’t mind seeing broadcast to an international audience in the next Lester & Charlie Newsletter? Leave it here!

The GOP’s Pre-Elamite Path To History

In Study Break on October 28, 2012 at 5:27 pm

No, that’s not a picture of John McCain‘s long-form birth certificate. It’s a swatch of a clay tablet inscribed about 3200 B.C. somewhere around what’s now the southwestern corner of Iran.

And nobody knows what it says.

Scholars have been puzzled by this and about 1,000 other pre-elamite tablets that stubbornly refuse to reveal their secrets – none of the tablets is written bilingually, like the Rosetta Stone, so there’s no way to compare texts and crack the code by using known or surviving languages. The people who wrote it had no interest in or budget for art, so there are no pictures or doodles for scientists to use to figure out if the adjacent text is discussing cows, kings or corn. Scholars have figured out from a few numbers they deciphered that this society was comprised of a few wealthy leaders and that most everyone else was a worker kept on starvation level rations.

And recently, scholars realized what might be a key reason they can’t decode these tablets: the society had no scholarly tradition, no interest in education, and the writing is littered with typos that undermine efforts to translate the words.

So, this civilization’s memory and accomplishments, if they had any, are relegated to a room full of dusty tablets that no one can make heads or tails of.

Let’s recap. A nation that eschewed bilingualism, had no place for art and didn’t like education eventually died out, doomed to the quiet room of history.

Maybe conservatives in Louisiana should be reminded of this as they cut education budgets, teach kids “Bible Math” and tell our next generation that Jesus ran with dinosaurs; maybe Ryan should keep this in mind when he says that supporting the arts is a bad investment for the country; maybe Jan Brewer should stop having panic attacks when she sees a bilingual sign; and maybe we shouldn’t let Romney shoot Big Bird, try to make the lower classes pay off the debt and stop feeding the 47% of the country that he thinks are moochers.

Or, we can dare to let history repeat.

And Now for Something Really Amazing!

In Poll on October 25, 2012 at 1:37 pm

This Week’s Poll!

It’s October and it’s an election year! So before you pop a Xanax to prepare for all the five-year-olds in Dick Cheney masks knocking on your door and taking your candy, brace yourself for another American political tradition: the October Surprise! You know what that is: The game-changing announcement right before an election that makes you rethink who you’re going to vote for.

This week, two red-white-and-blue media whores did their patriotic duty and tried to serve up some scandals. On Wednesday, Donald Trump delivered some information that hard-hitting journalists everywhere hoped would “shake the entire fabric of the nation.” And what was it? Trump stunned the country with an offer to pay the charity of Obama’s choice a whopping $5 million if Obama released his college applications and school transcripts.

Hmm. Well, $5 million might change the fabric on Trump’s head, but not the nation. But fear not! Enter Gloria Allred, Trump’s counterpart – albeit a liberal woman with boring hair — who, like Trump, never met a photo op she didn’t like. Allred has a game-changer involving Mitt Romney. Brace yourself: she might have evidence that Mitt Romney lied in public. Heavens! That should come as a surprise only to people who didn’t watch any of the debates. And here we thought the only thing that lied better than Romney is the rug on Trump’s head.

Meh. Maybe they don’t make October Surprises like they used to. Time was when a bombshell dropped just before an election really meant something. Kissinger announcing “peace is at hand” in Vietnam. Reagan’s defense secretary being implicated in Iran-Contra. Schwarzenegger praising Hitler. (Really!)

Have we become jaded? Or did the October Surprise tradition just get off to a rocky start? Maybe we need to bring back Gracie Allen’s Surprise Party to meet our national expectations with slogans like, “I don’t know much about the Lend-Lease Bill, but if we owe it we should pay it.”

But before you give up on the Allreds, the Trumps, the Coulters or Mrs. and Miss Bachmann, the clown car still has a few miles left to travel this month – and a lot of lunatics out there have plenty of ways to make Halloween spooky!

Everybody wants to keep this exciting. So tell us: Is there still time for a game-changer? What last-minute bombshells do YOU see being launched at the November elections?

Want to find out what people wrote in? Subscribe to the Lester & Charlie Newsletter!

Struggling to make ends meet? Lester & Charlie can show you how to save tens of dollars on your next trip to the drug store!

Have a private comment that you wouldn’t mind seeing broadcast to an international audience in the next Lester & Charlie Newsletter? Leave it here!